Fix a remapping failure when nested tuples are involved

This commit is contained in:
Denis Blank 2018-02-27 17:18:52 +01:00
parent 2cbac4da98
commit 17f454ceb6
3 changed files with 24 additions and 14 deletions

View File

@ -162,11 +162,11 @@ struct result_relocator_mapper {
void traverse_tuple_like(std::integer_sequence<std::size_t, I...>,
Index* index, Result* result) {
(void)std::initializer_list<int>{(
(void)traverse(
traversal::container_category_of_t<decltype(std::get<I>(*index))>{},
&std::get<I>(*index), &std::get<I>(*result)),
0)...};
(void)std::initializer_list<int>{
((void)traverse(traversal::container_category_of_t<
std::decay_t<decltype(std::get<I>(*index))>>{},
&std::get<I>(*index), &std::get<I>(*result)),
0)...};
}
/// Traverse tuple like container
@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ template <typename Relocator, typename Index, typename Target>
constexpr void relocate_index_pack(Relocator&& relocator, Index* index,
Target* target) {
constexpr traversal::container_category_of_t<Index> const tag;
constexpr traversal::container_category_of_t<std::decay_t<Index>> const tag;
detail::result_relocator_mapper<std::decay_t<Relocator>> mapper{
std::forward<Relocator>(relocator)};

View File

@ -31,14 +31,15 @@
#ifndef CONTINUABLE_DETAIL_COMPOSITION_SEQ_HPP_INCLUDED
#define CONTINUABLE_DETAIL_COMPOSITION_SEQ_HPP_INCLUDED
#include <cassert>
#include <memory>
#include <tuple>
#include <type_traits>
#include <utility>
#include <continuable/continuable-promise-base.hpp>
#include <continuable/continuable-traverse-async.hpp>
#include <continuable/detail/base.hpp>
#include <continuable/detail/composition_all.hpp>
#include <continuable/detail/composition_remapping.hpp>
#include <continuable/detail/traits.hpp>
@ -87,14 +88,14 @@ struct result_indexer_mapper {
template <
typename T,
std::enable_if_t<base::is_continuable<std::decay_t<T>>::value>* = nullptr>
auto operator()(T& continuable) {
auto operator()(T&& continuable) {
auto constexpr const hint = hints::hint_of(traits::identify<T>{});
using target =
decltype(remapping::detail::result_extractor_mapper::initialize(hint));
using type = indexed_continuable<std::decay_t<T>, target>;
return type{std::move(continuable), nullptr};
return type{std::forward<T>(continuable), nullptr};
}
};
@ -167,6 +168,9 @@ public:
template <typename Index, typename N>
void operator()(async_traverse_detach_tag, Index&& index, N&& next) {
assert(index.target && "The target should be non null here!"
"Probably this is caused through a bug in "
"result_relocator_mapper!");
std::move(index.continuable)
.then([ target = index.target,
@ -198,7 +202,9 @@ template <>
struct composition_finalizer<composition_strategy_seq_tag> {
template <typename Composition>
static constexpr auto hint() {
return decltype(all::deduce_hint(std::declval<Composition>())){};
// The result is the same as in the all composition
using all_finalizer = composition_finalizer<composition_strategy_all_tag>;
return all_finalizer::hint<Composition>();
}
/// Finalizes the all logic of a given composition

View File

@ -124,10 +124,14 @@ void old() {
int main(int, char**) {
using namespace cti::detail;
apply_composition(composition::composition_strategy_seq_tag{},
cti::make_ready_continuable(0, 1), 2)
.then([](int a0, int a1, int a2) {
apply_composition(
composition::composition_strategy_seq_tag{},
cti::make_ready_continuable(0, 1), 2,
std::vector<cti::continuable<int>>{cti::make_ready_continuable(8),
cti::make_ready_continuable(9)},
std::make_tuple(std::make_tuple(cti::make_ready_continuable(7))))
.then([](int a0, int a1, int a2, auto o1, auto o2) {
// ...
util::unused(a0, a1, a2);
util::unused(a0, a1, a2, o1, o2);
});
}