mirror of
https://chromium.googlesource.com/libyuv/libyuv
synced 2026-06-18 01:46:11 +08:00
Update patch set 2
Patch Set 2:
(1 comment)
Patch-set: 2
Attention: {"person_ident":"Gerrit User 1115898 \u003c1115898@3ce6091f-6c88-37e8-8c75-72f92ae8dfba\u003e","operation":"REMOVE","reason":"\u003cGERRIT_ACCOUNT_1115898\u003e replied on the change"}
This commit is contained in:
parent
45278ad37e
commit
8ac87c87ab
@ -33,6 +33,23 @@
|
||||
"message": "Sorry about the delay in review. I was sick last week and somehow missed this CL.\n\nI am not really qualified to review this change, because I don\u0027t fully understand the problem we need to solve. Here are two initial thoughts.\n\n1) I am not sure if libyuv\u0027s BUILD.gn file can assume the compiler is Clang.\n\n2) I am wondering if it is the [proposed change to build/config/compiler/BUILD.gn](https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/5904093/1/build/config/compiler/BUILD.gn) that should be changed to use the Clang cc1 flag \"-target-feature\":\n\n\n```\nconfig(\"compiler_arm64_lse\") {\n if (current_cpu \u003d\u003d \"arm64\" \u0026\u0026 aarch64_use_lse) {\n cflags \u003d [ \"-march\u003darmv8-a+lse\" ]\n ldflags \u003d [ \"-march\u003darmv8-a+lse\" ]\n }\n}\n```",
|
||||
"revId": "298bd480ba48b445d8c185b4a660be96256f4b4a",
|
||||
"serverId": "3ce6091f-6c88-37e8-8c75-72f92ae8dfba"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"unresolved": false,
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "5a7b8249_2245e48a",
|
||||
"filename": "/PATCHSET_LEVEL",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 2
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 0,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 1115898
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2024-10-31T17:36:06Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "Does this still work for gcc and other compilers that support -march?",
|
||||
"revId": "298bd480ba48b445d8c185b4a660be96256f4b4a",
|
||||
"serverId": "3ce6091f-6c88-37e8-8c75-72f92ae8dfba"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user